Skip to main content

Fair Use?




In 1976, the copyright law was rewritten, because the music industry along with other forms of media justified a need to revisit the law. Fair use was introduced, and perceptively educators thought that this law would be a good thing. It provides many benefits to educational institutions. Resources are often limited, and for many teachers, instructors, and professors, supplying a purchased copy of print or other type of media may not be an option. The copyright law acknowledges that an originator/author has the right to assume their creations, whether that be their writing or other media, as their personal property, and therefore also have the ability to control it's physical propagation. The Fair Use, written underneath the copyright law was supposed to depict that portions of print or media could be utilized for educational purposes, but the problem is that the fair use law was so loosely defined that it is perceived as "illusory" (Crews). It seems that the fair use law would allow non-profit education institutions utilize print and media, and it seems clear enough, but in addition to the law it also provides four guidelines in addition to, which from my perspective make the law a bit unstable, because it opens a lot of questions up for discussion that would be left unanswered by this law and its guidelines. The Fair Use Law and it's four guidelines are posted below


        Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work,     including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—

  1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes
  2. the nature of the copyrighted work
  3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
  4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work



In response to the law and the four guidelines, the following are two considerable aspects of concerns in relation to the fair use law.

  • MOOC's- Massive Online Open Courses could have a deep economic affect on the copyrighted materials, or atleast could be perceived that way.
  • Private school and Higher educational use of print and media- A lot of private schools, along with a vast majority of post-secondary schools are for profit, and this poses the question of whether professors and instructors in these roles are protected by the fair use law.
One thing I found interesting, was the second guideline. How would the nature of the copyrighted work affect how we can define fair use? Is this aspect generalized so as to provide generalized protection for the copyright law?


More information about the fair use law and resources to access.


Works Cited


Crews, Kenneth D. "The Law of Fair Use and the Illusion of Fair-Use Guidelines." Ohio State Law    Journal62 (2001): 602-700. Web.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Homeschool Communities

Homeschool is the new rage. I was homeschooled, and it seemed that I was part of a minority group. From my perspective it felt like my family was bizarre. I yearned to be normal and blend in with other young adults. The last thing I wanted was to be ostracized. Now, homeschooling families, with the assistance of social media, have access to community support groups designed to meet the needs of homeschooling families. Nowadays, you can connect and be a part of any community. The internet has become a web, connecting people with similar interests. Social media platforms have greatly increased the support and benefit for those that decide to educate their children at home. When social media first emerged, people feared that we would become senseless drones buried in a computer or mobile phone. That concept was a bit exaggerated, and though younger generations have seemed to lose interest with intrapersonal interaction, social media has also increased our ability to connect with other...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is AR the Future of Education?

When I was a very young girl, I always wanted to travel the world. I was curious as to what other people were like, along with their culture and geographical setting. The internet has allowed me to get a taste for what the world is like. I have travelled to numerous places, but for the places that I have yet to traverse I can at least have secondary view of what different places, peoples, and cultures are like, and AR apps and platforms have made this possible. The internet and search engines brought books to life, and now AR and VR serve to bring the internet alive. The world is now within your grasp; not only is the information available through text, but it presents a technological capability of visual representation. Should we hold our applause for the day that the data can also be represented by an experience, and experience that allows us to touch and feel. AR technology like Blippar, is just the beginning of AR being incorporated into the classroom. Is it possible that AR is...
2 comments
Read more

The more data we create...the more human.

Michelle Killebrew points out some important aspects of social media, and connectivity to web 2.0. With the advance of gathering more and more data, and an ability to display various forms of data it empowers each individual with a connection the ability connect with other people with likeness, display our thoughts/emotions, and for others to know our habits. It would seem that this data exposes us as human beings, but it also opens doors for us to create connection where they would not naturally occur without some form web 2.0 social platform. Killebrew argues that web 2.0 may make us more vulnerable, but that it also makes us more human. I would agree with Michelle about the nature of web 2.0 and its ability to make us vulnerable, but yet more human, and empower each individual to become the center stage for any political or social issue. What this really imposes with the human race is a responsibility to ensure that data is being protected and that our yearning to be more human ...
Post a Comment
Read more